Rugpull Token

avatar


Rugpullrugpull.jpg

Motto:

I lost it in a boating accident.

Rugpull Token is a fictional token designed specifically for legalized tax evasion. As I have stated many times, crypto is programmable smart money not under the control of the government. This implies that smart money will know how to fully evade government control, even if the citizens using crypto are bent to their own government's will (for now). Just like Jurassic Park, crypto finds a way.

A post I wrote the other day detailed how crypto (and more specifically yield/airdrops) might soon be classified as "new property created by taxpayers". Should this happen it will make my White-Elephant Airdrop Attack null and void. Airdrops won't be taxed until they are sold so the infinite liquidity assumption can't be exploited.

However, in programming, life, and especially complex economies, when one variable is changed to fix one area, it ends up usually having massive unintended consequences in another area. For example, we might think it's a good idea to increase minimum wage so that the poor become less poor. However, by manipulating free-market capitalism with this kind of socialism we create another problem: now it costs more the run and operate a small business. Now more small businesses are going bankrupt or can simply no longer maintain profitability, so this created another serious problem. In addition, raising the minimum wage artificially creates incentive to automate systems and eliminate jobs entirely, which could also have extremely negative ramifications.

dltdistributedledgernodesservers.png

So while classifying airdrops and yield as "newly created property" is a very smart thing to do and makes a ton of sense, it also makes it even easier to evade taxes altogether (legally) with a token like Rugpull.

How would Rugpull work?

Easy, everyone figures out how much profit/income they generated in a certain tax year (let's use 2022), then at the end of the year we throw exactly that much money into Rugpull and Rugpull rugs us. We just lost all that money. Too bad, so sad. How could we have known? Whelp, I guess I don't owe any taxes this year because I lost it all.

Unfortunately this strategy doesn't work very well for income. Technically you have to pay income taxes on income and it wouldn't matter if you got Rugpulled. Income is income. You can't deduct capital gains losses from it.

However, is yield income? Is an airdrop income? Once again we see that if this legal precedence classifies these things as "newly created property" we could argue that it's not income at all. It is unrealized value on property that we created. We don't know the value because the value has not be realized, and thus it can't be income.

What's the point?

The point is that if the government want's to classify crypto as property, we should hold them to it. Not let them have their cake and eat it too, calling it property or income randomly when it suits them in the given moment. This would make Rugpull Token exponentially stronger.

How would it become stronger?

Selling your "newly created property" for Rugpull tokens wouldn't be income related. It would be a capital gains tax, which means once the rugpull happens we could deduct everything from our taxes and claim we made zero dollars that year no matter how much we actually made. It's all right there on chain. Rugpull rugpulled. I lost my money.

But then on January 1st the Rugpull dev has a change of heart. He creates Rugpull2 token and airdrops everyone he stole from their coins back and reboots the liquidity pool (lets say it's on BSC and paired to BNB). So now anyone can dump their Rugpull tokens back out to BNB and exit if they want.

Once again, this 'airdrop' is arguably property and not income. Which is a huge distinction for the reasons mentioned. So imagine just keeping that value in the Rugpull/BNB LP for the entire year. If this new law should set precedence, that means this airdrop is untaxable because you never sold it. It also might be possible to hold it an entire year, cash it out, and then claim it as a long-term capital gain, whose taxes are multiples lower (and sometimes 0%).

capitalgainstaxbracketcryptoirs2020.png

This is old data from 2020.
New numbers are a little higher every year.

It would also obviously be possible to simply dump all the Rugpull tokens for BNB on Jan 1st and claim short-term capital gains on the 'airdrop'. Then at the end of the year you just Rugpull2 again and cancel out all the gains you make for the entire year all over again. On Jan 1st you'd receive Rugpull3 tokens.

Think of the ramifications.

What on earth would the IRS do if this was a thing? They are very much trapped in a corner. They can't fix this problem so easily, because fixing it would inevitably lead to another attack vector or even worse problems than the original.

They can't tell people they aren't allowed to declare losses on crypto. That would obviously be insane. They can't write a loophole law either that says Rugpull itself is not allowed to do what it does, because it doesn't have to be called Rugpull, and it can be a secret Rugpull that isn't even advertised as such.

boatingaccident.jpg

Essentially once the IRS caught wind of this exploit and actually tried to fix it (5 years down the line) it would already be way too late. The code is open source, everyone can fork it, so the protocol goes underground and fractures into a hundred different pieces. Now instead of there being one Rugpull token that everyone knowns about, there are a hundred private Rugpull tokens that the IRS will not be able to distinguish if they are real rugpulls or fake ones designed to evade taxes. In turn, it might take them another 5 years to pivot around this new decentralized version of RugPull. That being said, I will describe the obvious solution in my next post. Spoiler alert: it's a 5%-10% unavoidable flat tax.

Conclusion

This is the insanity crypto is about to unleash on the legacy economy. The protocol I've just described was something that I just came up with off the top of my head. Imagine how many financial gymnastics are actually going to happen in the next ten years. It's going to be absolute insanity. Rugpull token will seem like child's play compared to the things that actually happen during the Great Disruption.

At the end of the day it is simply offensive that the government would even attempt to tax crypto. They do not control these networks. They can not control these networks. They have no right to the value stored on these networks. Eventually they will come to realize this and have to pivot accordingly, but until then they will unleash the hounds.

It becomes obvious that people themselves are indentured servants to the government. We know this to be true because we are building value on systems they do not control, yet they expect their cut anyway and they threaten to throw us in a cage if we don't pay the protection money. This is no different than the mafia. If they expect us to pay taxes for communal infrastructure then they have to provide the communal infrastructure. However, we know they can't because the system is broken and the money flows into crony capitalism instead. There's a war coming, a digital war, and it's not going to be pretty because it will bleed into the real world something fierce.

Taxes used to make sense, and now they don't. They used to make sense because we were making that money using resources that the government did control. It makes sense to pay taxes when we're earning money within a system that needs the money to pay for communal infrastructure. However, that is no longer happening. We are building our own game and the government wants to flip the board. Good luck with that, gubment.

I hate to say this, but what we really need are for people to suffer for the greater good. We need people to be brought to court and lose. We need the government to demand the defendants to hand over their crypto and have them say "No", or "I lost it in a boating accident. Sorry." We need these people to go to jail for 5-10 years and then come out as billionaires. Gee, I wonder what they are going to do with all that money once they get out.

I wonder how much incentive they will have to dismantle the very government that threw them in a cage and tortured them and took away all their rights as a person. Revolutionaries will be born, yet again from a taxation dispute (funny how that works out).

Again, the future of the Great Disruption is going to be an insanely ugly event, but I guarantee it will be necessary. These dinosaurs aren't going to just lay down and die. Count on it. They will lash out violently even when they know they've already lost. Simply out of spite. Know your enemy. Know yourself.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta



0
0
0.000
34 comments
avatar

This is a great theory that might be put to practice in some cases. Lucky enough in my country I need to pay taxes on yields and not overall transactions, so it might be fair enough to do just that.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

The nations that see when decentralization leads to freedom are already tightening the screws. China recognized it quickly. When a country loses control of the currency, the country loses control! The US government is backed into a corner. When currency can no longer be tied to a social security number, the government loses control. The Patriot Act was about much more than terrorism. The US Government realized that it could not monitor people when it could not track who held how much currency. Go to any bank, try to open any credit card and you will quickly find that the US Government won't allow it without identification (social, tax id). That's why the government is so scared of crypto. They won't know who owns what.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Imagine how many financial gymnastics are actually going to happen in the next ten years.

Lol I envision a lot of regulators leaving their jobs.

Rugpull really is an interesting concept.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

Rugpull your way out of taxes? Who's your plug because I love the reaction of whatever it is you had...:)

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

not much different from corporations carrying forward losses or using different LLC's to buy and sell from each other and never show a profit yet stay in business for decades :). Rug Pull Coin has already existed for those in the know since the invention of taxes. What would happen if every single citizen just didn't file taxes? That would be awesome to experience!

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is the whole "be your own central bank" argument.
Crypto allows anyone to use the same tools as institutions.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I mean, multi-national corporations already have entire teams who work on figuring out how to avoid minimise tax by moving assets around their various parent/child companies in different locations.... so really Rugpull really just evens up the playing field.

You could Rugpull Coin for a couple of years and then become a citizen in Malta or Portugal where crypto isn't taxed and buy your real estate, get your golden visa and then you're set.... you could probably then use your Maltese/Portuguese credit cards in the US for the time you spend there.

The annoying thing about your minimum wage example (which is spot on by the way) is that the minimum wage wouldn't need to be increased if land use zoning laws weren't so restrictive - driving up property prices and rental prices to levels where minimum wage needs to be increased or people just have to work 3 jobs to make ends meet. Either be capitalist or be socialist, but don't be the worst of both.

0
0
0.000
avatar

From a government perspective, it is necessary to impose building standards. Hovels do not generate the same amount of property tax as a home built to standards. Yes, it prices the poor out of owning property. But, if the poor own property, they would suddenly be able to get by without government assistance.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I mean, I'm not even talking hovels, but just reasonable priced places to live. Obviously huge houses and luxury apartments generate way more council revenue than affordable housing... and so both councils and developers are aligned to only produce the most expensive (and revenue generating) accommodation.

I don't believe local councils and state governments want people needing government assistance, especially since that eats out of their budgets and makes states dependent on Federal government funding... but I also think there's a ton of regulation in place that prioritizes McMansions over anything else.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You’re right. Cynicism gets the best of me from time to time. They say the road to hell is paved with good intentions. This is a situation where do gooders harm the people who can least afford it. It’s more myopic than conspiratorial. That level of evil requires a degree of competency that is beyond them.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Agreed!
I've been working with my local council to figure out some zoning stuff and everyone I've spoken to has seemed lovely and wanted to help, but is constantly hamstrung by lack of resourcing and outdated policy/regulations. I'd be pretty confident in guessing that the people most frustrated with government are the people working in government.

0
0
0.000
avatar

well, one of the perks of living in a dysfunctional third-world country like mine is that you don't have to worry about tax or even the government and its agencies because there are always loopholes to exploit. I have never paid any direct income tax in my twenty-something years on this planet. That might change when I migrate and it's something I think I need to understand a lot better.

I hate to say this, but what we really need are for people to suffer for the greater good. We need people to be brought to court and lose. We need the government to demand the defendants to hand over their crypto and have them say "No", or "I lost it in a boating accident. Sorry." We need these people to go to jail for 5-10 years and then come out as billionaires. Gee, I wonder what they are going to do with all that money once they get out.

will they play fair--the government? when pushed to the wall will they abide by the rules they set? we have seen in the past how that is not the case. In this power struggle, there would be more causalities than jail time.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think you will just have to keep in mind, when you migrate, that governments see money as theirs. Thus, they have to use any means necessary to get their money back from you. This is why they put their name on the money.

A less cynical way of viewing it is that tax laws are instruction manuals that show you how to keep as much money as possible. It is no accident that the wealthy are able to maintain their wealth. They play by the tax rules.

So, whatever country you choose, do attend seminars and courses about taxes. It will pay off.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is quite useful. Thanks for the information, I will learn all I can now while it's easy.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

What you call a Rugpull token seems much like a loan. Tax collectors must be brain damaged if they can't handle this. On the other hand, they must be brain damaged if they think they can tax crypto so... it might work 🤷‍♂️

0
0
0.000
avatar

You are a mastermind. The only risk is the actual rug pull if the issuer does not airdrop a second token.

Posted using LeoFinance Mobile

0
0
0.000
avatar

very interesting post! I always thought that the government will always find a way to take away your earnings, before people flip table. Especially in countries like china, they just put a law on how much actor/entertainers are supposed to earn maximum for shooting a movie / TV drama. It is CRAZY! 😅

0
0
0.000
avatar

I was almost a victim, the project overview was too good to be true. That period the spirit of greed was far away from me.

Posted using LeoFinance Mobile

0
0
0.000
avatar

Okay this is one of the smartest things I've read recently! Excellent case to illustrate the revolution that crypto is going to unleash in the traditional economy

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

@edicted
I fully Agreed with you that if government doing nothing for crypto then how they impose tax on it. If government want to impose tax then government pay money which is needed for communal infrastructure. Government has no control on prices of cryptocurrencies, Prices of coins are sometime increase so high, sometime decrease so high, there is no fix value of that property. Only government want money from crypto investors and don't want to do anything for crypto.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I have a feeling the government would try something to get that money even if they had to rely on passing new laws to do it. Then again, couldn't you just claim 40k on long-term without worrying about the rugpull token? Of course it's not that much but it is something.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

If staked tokens are not taxed, I will (hypothetically of course) put all of my resources into stakeable tokens (like HIVE for example).

Then someone like @edicted will create a defi lending platform on the HIVE blockchain :-)

Then I will borrow HBD from myself (loans are already not taxable) and live off of that (assuming the HIVE ecosystem also evolves to HBD being a usable means of real commerce).

Create HP (staked) by taking 100% HP for blogging, commenting, etc. Loan myself HBD to live off of. Lather rinse repeat. As long as I can generate enough HP to keep my debt to loan ratio within accepted parameters, it would be like a magic tax-free money machine.

Of course, the government is not gonna let this stand. So, next step Loan myself HBD and exchange that on a truly decentralized DEX for privacy coins.

They are dealing with a Pandora's box that they can't really shut as long as the internet becomes truly decentralized. My fear is that a truly decentralized internet is gonna be the weak link for the people, but that will come too. Not before some examples are made though. I hope those examples come from the government, but I am afraid they will come from the people first.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

i cant believe i read all that but I second your thought about the government not having their cake and also eating it. One a person who has made a huge profit got rugpulled, the amount invested should be deducted from the tax expected from that person. it is as easy as that

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

I wonder how "I was rugged" is gunna stand up in court lol

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

0
0
0.000
avatar

How could it not?

When CUB launched and everyone was in a DEFI craze it felt like someone was getting rugged every single day.

Not a fake rug, a real rug.

Possession is 9/10ths of the law, so if they don't find keys in your possession with crypto on them then they can't really prove you own the crypto. Not your keys not your crypto applies to the law as well. This creates a very weird Catch-22 situation for law enforcement. If they had they keys they wouldn't need to take you to court but if they take you to court they need to find the keys.

0
0
0.000