🦅About Magnus Carlsen and Hans Niemann🦅

avatar
(Edited)

Image taken from https://es.chessbase.com/


English
Español

Welcome to my first post on this alternative account, the main one is below. I was very interested in the Hans-Magnus case, because according to what he says in this interview tells about the place he played in this episode. >Before I follow my own thoughts, I want to clarify that I am not a judge, and I don't think we should put ourselves in this place, here are my words.
Bienvenidos a mi primer post en este relato alternativo, el principal está abajo. Me interesó mucho el caso de Hans-Magnus, porque según lo que dice en esta entrevista cuenta el lugar que ocupó en este episodio. >Antes de seguir mis propios pensamientos, quiero aclarar que no soy un juez, y no creo que debamos ponernos en este lugar, aquí están mis palabras.

I clarify that this is not telling what happened, that in this community I think you already know about it, I come to leave my point of view on the situation, as it makes me uncomfortable that society itself, I mean the set of subjects (en masse) do this to another, whether or not consistent with what he did.
Aclaro que esto no es contar lo que pasó, que en esta comunidad creo que ya lo saben, vengo a dejar mi punto de vista sobre la situación, ya que me incomoda que la propia sociedad, me refiero al conjunto de sujetos (en masa) le hagan esto a otro, sea o no consecuente con lo que hizo.


English
Español

As human beings, we are born with an ingrained conception of language, they think to us and in doing so, they speak to us. We have with it the ability to be objects of pleasure of the other, without talking about genital sexuality. What it generates here is a network where there are those who hurt, there are those who suffer. I think this is happening with Niemann, because I say, from where do we criticise and judge? Whether or not he cheated, there are conditions that speak of this, and it is the basis of capitalist society (related to what he talks about in the video above).
Como seres humanos, nacemos con una concepción arraigada del lenguaje, nos piensan y al hacerlo, nos hablan. Tenemos con ello la capacidad de ser objetos de placer del otro, sin hablar de sexualidad genital. Lo que genera aquí es una red en la que están los que duelen, están los que sufren. Creo que esto pasa con Niemann, porque digo, ¿desde dónde criticamos y juzgamos? Independientemente de que haya engañado o no, hay condiciones que hablan de esto, y es la base de la sociedad capitalista (relacionado con lo que habla en el video de arriba).
With the excuse of doing it out of necessity, whether or not it is an excuse to generate empathy or pity, since when do we not have these two qualities? Doesn't it hurt us to see him excluded in what is perhaps the only thing that matters to him?
Con la excusa de hacerlo por necesidad, sea o no una excusa para generar empatía o lástima, ¿desde cuándo no tenemos estas dos cualidades? ¿No nos duele verle excluido en lo que quizás es lo único que le importa?

English
Español

Let's say he cheated, in what context, place and situation, we are talking about representatives of the sport/game or whatever they like to call it, hikaru, magnus and chess.com. They talk about him ruining everything he could have built just because of a mistake that is purely human. That's why I think that these situations being a reflection of the current reality in the way we relate to each other teaches us something, by removing him from that place, making his "defence" his "judgement" null and void, we are excluding him and many others from that place that perhaps he enjoys, I understand that there are rules in the game as well as social, cultural and personal norms, but I think it shows a detriment in the relational aspect.
Digamos que hizo trampa, en qué contexto, lugar y situación, estamos hablando de representantes del deporte/juego o como quieran llamarlo, hikaru, magnus y chess.com. Hablan de que arruinó todo lo que pudo construir sólo por un error que es puramente humano. Por eso creo que estas situaciones al ser un reflejo de la realidad actual en la forma de relacionarnos nos enseña algo, al sacarlo de ese lugar, haciendo nula su "defensa" su "juicio", lo estamos excluyendo a él y a muchos otros de ese lugar que quizás disfruta, entiendo que hay reglas en el juego así como normas sociales, culturales y personales, pero creo que muestra un detrimento en el aspecto relacional.

We exclude the one who is different, who does different things and we put them as unbelievable laws making those who do not conform to this norm out of the system, because they cannot deny that if they are found to have cheated, they will be out for maybe the rest of their life, but if they did not, there is no way to find out either point, the fact is latent.
Excluimos al que es diferente, al que hace cosas diferentes y los ponemos como leyes increíbles haciendo que los que no se ajustan a esta norma queden fuera del sistema, porque no pueden negar que si se descubre que hicieron trampa, estarán fuera tal vez por el resto de su vida, pero si no lo hicieron, no hay manera de averiguar ningún punto, el hecho está latente.
I believe in humans, but in a society that is kinder to those others. They take Niemann as the worst of all, someone whose skill in chess is great, they take that place away from him because of a mistake, that mistake that those who defend him to the death, can break him because they are the ones who judge, also because of the place they are in, taking it for granted that those below, are not "they".
Creo en los humanos, pero en una sociedad más amable con esos otros. Toman a Niemann como el peor de todos, alguien cuya habilidad en el ajedrez es grande, le quitan ese lugar por un error, ese error que los que lo defienden a muerte, lo pueden romper porque son ellos los que juzgan, también por el lugar en el que están, dando por sentado que los de abajo, no son "ellos".

I would like this to take shape for the better, the law is made to be broken, but we go back to where we came from, we lay similar foundations that if broken are very strongly repudiated, to the point where, if that other was in a particular situation, mentally or economically where the force does not support him, he could commit suicide. I believe we must be better humans. 🔎(I would like those who read me to leave their comments on this, it is very important to listen, we must give a place to the other, so that we can all be at peace.)
Me gustaría que esto tomara forma para mejor, la ley está hecha para ser quebrantada, pero volvemos al lugar de donde venimos, sentamos bases similares que si se rompen son repudiadas muy fuertemente, hasta el punto de que, si ese otro estuviera en una situación particular, mental o económicamente donde la fuerza no lo apoya, podría suicidarse. Creo que debemos ser mejores humanos.🔎 (Me gustaría que los que me lean dejen sus comentarios al respecto, es muy importante escuchar, hay que darle un lugar al otro, para que todos podamos estar en paz.)

Thanks for reading, huge hug from ydaiz⭐

ydaiznfts🌷#1000 El club de Rising Star El club de Rising Star Twitter Reddit



0
0
0.000
15 comments
avatar

¡Enhorabuena!


Has recibido el voto de PROYECTO CHESS BROTHERS

✅ Has hecho un buen trabajo, por lo cual tu publicación ha sido valorada y ha recibido el apoyo de parte de CHESS BROTHERS ♔ 💪


♟ Te invitamos a usar nuestra etiqueta #chessbrothers y a que aprendas más sobre nosotros.

♟♟ También puedes contactarnos en nuestro servidor de Discord y promocionar allí tus publicaciones.

♟♟♟ Considera unirte a nuestro trail de curación para que trabajemos en equipo y recibas recompensas automáticamente.

♞♟ Echa un vistazo a nuestra cuenta @chessbrotherspro para que te informes sobre el proceso de curación llevado a diario por nuestro equipo.


Cordialmente

El equipo de CHESS BROTHERS

0
0
0.000
avatar

Muchas gracias, ya seguí su comentario, nos vemos en discord y en curation tail xd con: @ydaiznfts

0
0
0.000
avatar

Congratulations @ydaiznfts2! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You received more than 10 upvotes.
Your next target is to reach 50 upvotes.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

Our Hive Power Delegations to the September PUM Winners
Feedback from the October 1st Hive Power Up Day
Hive Power Up Month Challenge 2022-09 - Winners List
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!
0
0
0.000
avatar

I think that Carlson has panic attack or something, he is probably ill.
And that chess@com cancels so easy makes them the same as Fakebook and all other radical-left groups.
A big mistake was the story with Karjakin, why should one not have the right to say what one think. All this cancel culture things are so stupid in the end. If one makes a mistake, let it be a mistake, and move on.
I believe Hans fully and his interview gives a good insight in his mind and the way he is much more advanced in chess as many want him to be.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I believe that they harm the other, the culture of exclusion is useless, we generate in the other this discomfort that cannot be remedied.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I tended to agree after that interview, but apparently he had most likely cheated significantly more than the 2 times and more that he had confessed. Also in highly prestigious online games e.g. against Nepo and others.

image.png
And his rise in OTB strength is unique in chess history.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes, unfortunately they have information that he cheated on more than 100 occasions, even so my position remains the same, the error is human, the module (well developed🤣) does not make mistakes, because there are no mistakes, but bad moves for him, human error, let us not leave aside forgiveness. 😯

0
0
0.000