RE: LeoThread 2025-01-05 02:39
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
With all due respect, 'I’ve been here for a while' isn’t enough for me to consider an opinion valid—especially when countless users are claiming otherwise.
0
0
0.000
Who are the countless users? Can you tag a few of them on here?
I've been here for a while and I understand how the algorithm works. If you believe the "countless claims", then find a way to power up. Why should another user reduce the visibility (since HP increases visibility) of their posts by delegating some of their HP to you?
You’re asking frivolous questions. So far, your only argument is, 'I’ve been here for a while.'
Users with several thousand HP wouldn’t even notice delegating a small amount. Besides, some users earn through delegation and voting.
You are the one limiting yourself to that. I've told you the algorithm doesn't work like that. I know that through reading tons of materials and posting on this platform. My post trended when I had less than 100 HP. If you still don't see my reasons, it's not my fault.
Even if there is 1 HP delegation, it is a loss for whoever is delegated to you. You get all the curation rewards if you use it to vote. It differs from delegating to projects that share curation rewards with their delegators.
The moral thing to ask for is resource credit for you to be able to continue posting and interacting. You are asking someone to part with their money on the premise that it helps your post gain visibility. This is a misconception.
Your post can get trending even with zero HP. Views and votes do that, not the amount of HP you have.
Proposing users invest in a project isn’t immoral if they can benefit and withdraw funds anytime. If you’re not interested, that’s fine—no need for mental gymnastics or needless arguments.
So, what are you offering if I delegated my HP to you? What am I getting in return?