Child Sacrifice for Pharma Profits and the Power of Plutocrats
IMG source - rwmalonemd.substack.com
The following is the verbatim statement of Dr. Robert W. Malone's Substack you can find here. I particularly approve of the statement "we are the ones we have been waiting for."
Let's not wait any longer. If you think we should let our WEF infiltrated traitors deliver us and our posterity to the pharmaceutical corporations as designated test subjects and profit centers please explain why below in the comment section. Dr. Malone's message follows:
FDA Approves Pfizer Booster COVID Shot for Children
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amended the emergency use authorization (EUA) and authorized a booster dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot for children 5 through 11 years of age. The booster shot is 10 micrograms, which is the same dosage for this age group in their primary series and a third of that given to people aged 12 and older.
The decision will now go to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for approval.
On April 28, 2022, Moderna submitted a request to the FDA for EUA for its two-dose COVID-19 injection for children ages six months to under six years old.
When it comes to COVID, public health officials have consistently downplayed and ignored natural immunity among children. Yet 81 research studies confirm that natural immunity to COVID is equal or superior to any “vaccine immunity.”
Research shows that there is no benefit to children receiving a COVID shot, and in fact, the shots can cause potential harm, adverse effects and death. According to Pfizer’s own study trial data, the chance of death in children from the shot is 107 times higher than death from COVID.
In fact, the CDC recently reported higher COVID-19 case rates have been recorded among fully vaccinated children than unvaccinated in the age group 5-11 since February 2022. That’s the first time CDC recorded a higher case rate among fully vaccinated young children since data was first collected in December 2021.
In addition, the Office for National Statistics revealed that children are up to 52 times more likely to die following the COVID-19 injection than children who have not received it. In December 2021, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a dataset containing details on “deaths by vaccination status in England” per 100,000 people between January 1, 2021 and Oct 31, 2021. The data revealed that vaccinated children aged 10-14 were statistically 10 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and vaccinated teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically two times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.
However, the ONS data also shows during that time period, teenagers aged 15-19 who had two COVID shots were statistically three times more likely to die than teenagers who were not vaccinated. Children aged 10-14 who were double vaccinated were statistically 52 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children.
Scientific studies show that children are at very low risk of spreading the COVID infection to other children, to adults as seen in household transmission studies, or becoming very ill or dying. According to a 2020 Yale University report, scientists have observed that children fare much better than adults and have very diverse and different immune system responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and have far less illness or mortality from COVID. Studies by Ankit B. Patel and Dr. Supinda Bunyavanich show the virus has limited expression and presence in the upper respiratory area in young children. This partly explains why children are less likely to be infected in the first place, or spread it to other children or adults, or even get severely ill. Research published in August 2021 by J. Loske also revealed that “the airway immune cells in children are primed for virus sensing resulting in a stronger early innate antiviral response to SARS-CoV-2 infection than in adults.”
Why the Centralization of Health via the WHO Should Be Resisted by Civil Society
Dr. Silvia Behrendt is the founder of the Global Health Responsibility Agency for accountability and transparency for health decisions. She was previously a consultant to the WHO on the IHR and wrote her Ph.D. about the executive authority of the WHO-DC during PHEIC.
This is an edited segment from the weekly live General Assembly meeting on May 9, 2022. This presentation is also available on Rumble and on Odysee. The full General Assembly Meeting is available in the Newsroom.
Background
The International Health Regulations (IHR) was adopted by 194 member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005. They enable the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) if it decides that an infectious disease outbreak has occurred in a member state, but with the consent of the member state. The World Council for Health (WCH) acknowledges this aspect of the current regulations because it recognizes the sovereignty of nations that adopted the IHR. But that is about to change.
Key Issues to Understand
On January 18th 2022, the United States Department of Health and Human Services proposed amendments to the IHR. These amendments give control over the declaration of a public health emergency in any member state to the WHO Director-General – even over the objection of the member state. The Director-General communicated the text of the proposed amendments on 20 January 2022, via a circular letter to State Parties.
The proposed IHR amendments also cede control to WHO “regional directors,” who are given the authority to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). Moreover, the proposed amendments allow the Director-General to ring an international alarm bell, by unilaterally issuing an “Intermediate Public Health Alert (IPHA).”
Properly understood, the proposed IHR amendments are directed towards establishing a globalist architecture of worldwide health surveillance, reporting, and management. Consistent with a top-down view of governance, the public will not have opportunities to provide input or criticism concerning the amendments. This, of course, is a direct violation of the basic tenets of democracy and can be compared to the separate new pandemic treaty.
Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to the IHR
The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59
Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modeling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
48-hour deadline: Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval lead by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.
Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.
Rejecting the amendments: Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them. This means November, this year. If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect.
The World Council for Health’s Position On Proposed IHR Amendments
The WCH opposes the unnecessary and dystopian move toward centralized control of public health. This proven harmful model assumes that only one entity, WHO, understands how to manage the health policy of every state – and by implication, the health of each and every individual. It also assumes, incorrectly, that Big Pharma’s controversial model of medicine which is the WHO’s preferred model – is the expert guide to better health and wellness.
These proposed IHR amendments will be voted upon at the next World Health Assembly, which will take place in Geneva, May 22 to 28, 2022. The official agenda item is 16.2. It is not clear if the event will be broadcast for transparency. Thus, the WCH believes that it is essential to campaign against the proposed amendments and to build alternative pathways.
Why People Must Take Action Together
Due to the influence of private money at the WHO, a review in the Journal of Integrative Medicine & Therapy stated that the corruption of the WHO is the “biggest threat to the world’s public health of our time.” This is particularly true in relation to WHO drug recommendations, including its “list of essential medicines,” which a growing number of people believe is biased and unreliable.
Moreover, even though WHO’s documents highlight voice, agency, and social participation as drivers of equity and democracy, it is unknown World Health Assembly delegates who get to make decisions for us. To date, 13 days away from the World Health Assembly 75, the secretive list of each country’s delegates has been not been published. This is censorship.
Given consistent evidence that WHO is heavily conflicted and controlled by various industries, its usefulness as a guide to public health must be critically re-evaluated, while alternative paradigms and models for ethical health guidance and human rights are built.
Global #StopTheWho Campaign Activated
It is going to take each and all of us to campaign against the power grab through the IHR Amendments, this May, and onwards to November – just six months away. In the best campaigns for human rights, multi-pronged strategies are effective. Here are some ideas:
Speak: Raise awareness on the ground and online. Use articles, posters, videos
Act: Campaign through rallies, political mobilization, legal notices, and cases, etc.
Collaborate with health freedom coalitions such as the World Council for Health
Explore activist toolboxes such as: www.dontyoudare.info and stopthewho.com
Engage global indigenous leadership to take a united stand against the WHO’s IHR
Notify World Health Assembly country delegates to oppose the IHR amendments
Activate people’s parliaments, legislatures or referendums to oppose power grabs
You will also find #StopTheWho campaign resources uploaded to the World Council for Health website in the next few days.
Collectively, we are in the greatest awakening in history. Given our experiences the last 2 years, we know that we are the ones we have been waiting for. If not us, then who? If not now, then when? Let us join hands in taking back our health, our freedom, and our power.
In Unity for Health, Freedom, and Sovereignty,
World Council for Health (www.worldcouncilforhealth.org)
It's all good that Malone is sharing this information but you really do have to keep in mind that he's in on it. His job now is to try and and stir people to action. It's not really "we are the ones we have been waiting for" it's "you are the ones we have been waiting for". Malones real involvement in all this has been all along to mask who the real perpetrator of the vaccines is. If you went and read Charles Liebers patents there really is no doubt in my mind that it's him working in close coordination with Chinese scientist. Malone entered the stage when Liebers was arrested and he showed up on the circuit of prime time news shows when Liebers trial started talking his mass psychosis stuff. When he showed up on a segment of Laura Ingraham he was called out by another guest over his claim he invented mRNA technology being used in the vaccines. The guest flat out called his claim a lie to which Malone said he begged to differ on before Laura interrupted the two back on topic. If you read Liebers stuff it's mind boggling. It's through his research that inner cellular break throughs without destroying the cells is what brought forth mRNA technology as a success. His breakthroughs on the use of nanotubes is spectacular. Malone can only wish he had such a scientifically wonderful mind. (To bad it was used for nefarious purposes) I watch the news circuit to stay one step ahead of the enemy, not that I could stop them but at least I can see it coming. I can't even tell you how many times I've heard Laura and Tucker remark at their amazement how much the American people will put up with. The thing is they have tried everything and have failed to get the American people to rise up against one another. Now Malone is out there doing their bidding telling people to dox people and he'll give them their personal information to do it with. We can't allow ourselves to follow his dictates because that's what they want. Guns may be useless but if it's the only thing you got it's better than nothing. They are looking for a reason to take those guns away. The reason being is those guns may be useless towards a army but that army can't be everywhere at once. Those in the media who helped betray our country know they are at risk of being or becoming targets, much more easier targets than even getting at congressional members involved in all this. You can't narrow the focus down thinking it's just those holding power that want to take the guns, those who are and have been complicit while making millions betraying the populace on the nightly news shows know the potential of what could happen if everything goes to hell in a handbasket. They likely will be the first targets of an angry constituency. Like the new director of the misinformation bureau put it " how much of a bitch do I have to be to become rich" or some similar non sense like that. They, like the people paying them millions are all self serving, they really don't give one care about ordinary people. At this point they have a hidden vested interest in seeing people disarmed. It's only a matter of time at this point. As more research comes out over these vaccines and their harms, as people continue to lose their loved ones, family and friends...it's a ticking time bomb. Shows that Malone show up on have absolutely no problem making profits off commercials selling the poison, it's utterly disgraceful. Yet he shows up knowing full well he can't talk shit about the vaccines like his does on his videos and interviews shows you it's all about the exposure and money for him also. Why would one do it? Why would you show up on a news program to talk about anything but the vaccines, knowing the harms and them after your interview running a commercial for kids to get vaccinated. You either have integrity in what you are saying or you don't.
These kids vaccines is one of many reasons why Trump won't be allowed to win again in 2024. They will definitely try and mandate these vaccines for kids to be able to attend school. There's no way he can maintain his status and allow that to happen. They are already in the works to reframe the MAGA movement to a Populace movement. Yesterday I really wasn't getting it when I got a call from a researcher asking me political questions. One of the questions was if a candidate was part of the MAGA movement would I be more likely to vote for that person. Than after several more questions he asked me if I would vote for the new Republican movement. I asked him what he meant by new Republican movement, was he talking about the MAGA movement or those in the republican party who seem to be aligning themselves alongside the left. He couldn't answer that. Later on last night Stephen Miller shows up on Laura and starts talking about the new Populace movement. It'll be a slow reframing as time goes on, the betrayal by Trump won't be recognized until it's way to late. The constant framing you see of him as being the only person who can win against the democrats is on purpose. We know it's an outright lie to begin with because DeSantis could do it easily also, not to mention the local dog catcher. I am just saying these things are being designed, have been in the works for decades, Trump is part of that design because he is in on it, that's why it's pertinent he's the only republican that advances to run against the next democratic president, he's in the know, the thick of it and they haven't come this far to let an outsider in and really change the course of their plans.
The only basis I am aware of for this accusation is Malone stated who it was that attacked his medical license. Given that specific and singular event, I disagree with your implication that doxxing is a tactic Malone often employs.
Malone constantly 'talks shit' about the jabs, but as you can see from this post he is citing hard data and not talking out his ass.
I don't think Trump will even run. His strong advocacy for the jabs and the Warp Speed program has well established he is just another grifter, and he has lost at least half his audience. While I never supported Trump, I am less alone today in my strong distaste for his deceitful rhetoric, Q psyop, and rank advocacy for Israel, because his role in advancing the genocidal jabs has clued many in to his duplicitous nature.
He but half heartedly opposed the massive election fraud in 2020, and I think this reveals he has no interest in the job of President, probably because it is going to be this coming president that completes Biden's terminal destruction of the United States of America, and Trump is too vain to accept such a legacy. Also, he acquired massive amounts of extortion materials during his Presidency, and the office of the Presidency limits his freedom to use that material. His career has been built on blackmail, since he began his apprenticeship to Roy Cohn in the 70s.
Thanks!
That's not how it played out in the video I watched him in. He was openly advocating it was time to start fighting back. If I remember correctly his aim was toward the globalist players and said he'd furnish them with these individuals personal information.
Not on prime time television he is not. He may talk about the failure of mRNA technology but he is not allowed to bad mouth the jabs. He has spoke out against children being given these jabs. Even Dr McCullough is limited in what he can say about the vaccines. I was surprised to see him on Laura tonight given lead way to try and explain why it's the states with the highest vaccination rates seeing the highest covid cases. He could say the vaccines were waning in their ability to provide protection, something that has already pretty much been established because otherwise people wouldn't need more jabs. It was sort of a double speak conversation given cases are "supposedly not as severe" but that could have been just to save face with "whoever" it is behind the scenes that obviously must be a threat to anyone who outright claims the vaccines are a failure...that is never allowed to be said. So it was wishy washy between is it because it's a milder variant or the vaccines keeping from getting as ill.
Malone basically, as I said in my blog on it, stuck some peanut butter in some chocolate but never perfected it into a perfect peanut butter cup. Go ahead and spend some time going over these patents, yeah it's painstaking time consuming but you said you have some science back ground, see exactly who it was that found that the FE system using certain metal wires didn't cause the cells to explode, see who it was that got nanotubes successfully into the cells, see who it was that got those nanotube the ability to send back information of cellular activity and than you'll see Malone for the liar that he is because that man did not develop this mRNA technology being used or these vaccines.
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=19&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22%09Lieber%3B+Charles+M%22.INNM.&OS=IN/%22
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=11&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1=%22%09Lieber%3B+Charles+M%22.INNM.&OS=IN/%22
https://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040186459%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040186459&RS=DN/20040186459
Here's the thing. Malone is right that from the beginning they couldn't get it to last. That was a long time ago. Maybe he spent years more trying to do that which Liebers succeeded at but he failed. It wasn't just getting "whatever" into the cells to produce a positive result, which it does produce a positive result but it doesn't last, but also that it didn't destruct the cell or the cellular activities breaking through the cellular barrier.
If you go look at the blog I did on it it provides part of Malone's research and a link to it from at the beginning, it also provides a link to his patent, which has long expired. So you look at that than go over Liebers stuff, regardless if Liebers was involved or not you can certainly see the difference between the two so when he got called out on Laura's show for basically being a liar, actually was you are not the creator of the vaccines or technology, to which Malone said he begged to differ you will clearly conclude that Malone is lying. Than you can come back to me and tell me your conclusion on why someone would lie about such a thing.
I appreciate the perspective on Malone. While Malone's patent has expired, he certainly had that patent, and I find his present actions and perspective a lot more palatable than Lieber's, who was clearly a vile human being and traitor regarding this and other technology.
All that being said, I have too often taken rhetoric at face value, and you have set off my alarms that remained muted after noting he worked with the CIA, and I am going to be prepared now to completely disavow him when he advocates something sketchy.
I was just reading his latest screed, and found I agreed with many of the points he made and principles he espoused, but for one: I do not agree the state has authority over my medical care, and that seems to be his position. I'll keep a weather eye on him now, grateful to you for the head's up.
Thanks!
I didn't say he worked for the CIA though others have made that claim since I first surmised he may be a CIA operative or an informant. It was what he said about being active on social media that led to a CIA officer in Wuhan calling him on January 6, 2020 and that call was the first time he witnessed what mass formation psychosis was. I call bull crap about that one. How really likely is it that a CIA officer in Wuhan is calling you out of the blue showing signs of mass formation psychosis. It's just not believable. Second was the fact he could remember the date of the call off the top of his head. If a stranger called you over two years ago could you remember the exact date. I know I couldn't, maybe the month, the year but the exact day? Highly unlikely. As I was researching him also I found it particularly odd the number of jobs he's had in his life. He's either got a severe case of border line personality disorder, failed miserably at continued attempts to stick RNA into cells without causing damage to the cells, or those jobs are used as cover for CIA field operations. He also isn't the only one listed on his patent but he did not create the technology involved. Sticking RNA into the cells and it lasting four hours isn't a technology. I am not saying anything he is saying is wrong beyond the outright lie he's the creator of the mRNA technology, what I am saying is, in this current environment, can anything or some of things he is saying be trusted. Yes Charles Lieber is an evil man but none the less he is a evil man with a beautifully gifted mind.
Congratulations @valued-customer! You received a personal badge!
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!