A Few Words from John Campbell About the WHO and the Health Accord
IMG source - screencap of the video linked
Many of us have heard the WHO is attempting to create a new Health Accord because of claimed peril we face from novel diseases. Some of us have considered the lessons we have learned from the plandemic and are about as opposed to increasing the centralization of power and degradation of national sovereignty and human rights as is possible to be. There yet may be people that are concerned about the peril of pathogens more than they are concerned by elimination of human rights and national sovereignty.
Certainly humanity has suffered terrible plagues in the past, and all of us who intend to defend humanity from harm are absolutely opposed to such ravages of disease. But I am notoriously fixated on freedom, and alarmed at the lightest touch of totalitarianism on our greatest treasure, our liberty. I do find that people can feel I am overwrought about merely slight despotism, that they might find more beneficial and less the dire horror I may perceive them to be.
I therefore present my friends and enemies alike, both those that agree and disagree with my hair trigger at infringements of our freedom, an assessment of the Health Accord proposed by the WHO from a man known for his advocacy of lockdowns, masks, and the jabs for years, which only recently has he dialed back when his adherence to science compelled him.
John Campbell is a medical doctor and does not share my dedication to persuasion, nor the dramatic language I employ to reveal how harmful losing our freedom can be. He is well known for moderate views, and for speaking both plainly and mildly on the plandemic and our health. AFAIK, he has never used the word 'plandemic', for instance, nor ever accused pharmaceutical corporations, the medical industrial complex, or government officials of malice. Campbell is the very model of rectitude and reason, and has kept his Youtool channel during the entire duration of the scamdemic despite discussing it at least weekly that whole time, while neither just being another Big Pharma shill.
I hope my more moderate readers, or even those that outright often disagree with me, find his thoughts on the Health Accord proposal by the WHO reasonable, rational, and useful to them. Please follow the link above to view his comments regarding the Health Accord proposed by the WHO.
I'm subbed on YT and his videos pop up a lot. People following him have been on a journey of discovery, and if they were skeptical of seemingly wild claims, they are much less now.
While I was frustrated for a long time with his reticence, I can understand how wrenching it is to have to deconstruct one's whole world view and reject authority one previously had complete faith in. After he so long represented that world view, his acceptance of factual evidence has caused far stronger realization of his audience of the reality we face, and perhaps more beneficial affect than if he had, as I did, quickly and easily reject propaganda and the destruction of the West.
Ah well look at you trying to reach a larger audience.
Good for you!
Couldn't be me though.
Tin foil hats only please and thank you!
TBH, I do want to get more people to consider the predicament we are in, so we can get out of it faster.
I doubt I'll disappoint you going forward, though.
He may just be catching up to this, it's been out for awhile now and there's been strong opposition against it. Doesn't mean much, there's a lot of strong opposition against a lot of stuff but somehow, in the end, it gets passed. One big one I recall is republicans saying there was no way Biden's agenda would see the day of light but while cloaked in the darkness of the raid on Mar A Largo it got passed.
Republicrats and Demoblicans seem to be doomed to sneakily pass legislation they abhor, have sworn to oppose, and their opponents across the aisle promote, just when the lights go off and someone screams, lightning eerily strikes, and the bells begin to toll. Some while back I noted that it takes one cheek flapping against the other to produce the raucous stench and fury of political clamor, and this debate in America is always the product of one great big fat stinking arse that excretes is product all over we, the people, with predictable regularity.
Neither cheek can get anything done alone, but each relies upon the other to make a mess of everything when they work together, like the well-oiled machine they are.
As for Dr. Campbell, he seems sincere enough to me, and he's got plenty of folks that have stuck to his posts all along, so changing his mind late in the game seems to have been an effective means of converting a specific brand of his followers that would otherwise have never left the camp of true believers, for what it's worth. I doubt any of us early adopters have been much use converting true believers to infidelism.
Thanks!