RE: LeoThread 2024-10-17 17:59

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Wonder how much damage " content curation" did in the past years. I see some dude hunting threads ( also mine) with downvotes, but worse a lot of new accounts.

Every lead cost at minimum 10$ in Blockchain space. Good Hive saved 2 cents lol



0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar

Thats why LEO is so powerful

Remove the policing by abstracting rewards to the second layer

0
0
0.000
avatar

I still think Hive would need to be a neutral carrier of information without any rewarding to offer a neutral freedom of speech experience.

All rewarding L2.

And i think the damage done is in the millions of dollars over the year already

0
0
0.000
avatar

i mean this would allow incentives to monetize content competitively. And creativity could take over besides indoctrination.

I talk about real value. That could work like content networks itself.

0
0
0.000
avatar

There is a very likely chance LEO rewards outpace all other rewards received

This is not an issue or competition

Instead, it’s positive for the base layer. It allows rewards to flow at the top

0
0
0.000
avatar

I mean it is not about the rewards mostly, its about what comes with them, like viability, trending, reputation and ofc the fun aspect. Those work a negative way too.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yeah Competition more in " neutral base layer" = Market driven rewards not inflation

0
0
0.000
avatar

Then why are leo.vote's votes so Hive/HBD heavy and quite light on LEO?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Because that’s the hive power-based voter we operate

The LEO power-based voters are the main accounts which vote separately

0
0
0.000
avatar

Right, my point is that the main vote coming from the InLeo frontent is being wiped out by Hive Watchers and that doesn't make InLeo much of a safe haven. Just something for you to think about.

0
0
0.000