RE: Ai art: How good and how bad?

@jamerussell Yeah,the program I used which was more analytical and result satisfactory compared to others was MIDJOURNEY on discord , I stumbled on it through a YouTube post. You can check it out with a Google search.

As regards "what would happen to the talent of natural artist who work very hard to create what they have made?"
My answer: It would augment them, provided they are open to the benefits Ai art have to offer. Rather than see it as a potential threat, it should be seen as an advantage and an innovation that give room for optimization and advancement as regards the art-world.
You asking me this is just like you asking "what will happen to petrol powered cars if electric cars finally saturate the planet or what will happen to newspapers when people start to read news on their smartphone which people have obviously started to.
Ai art is an innovation, we are human beings, we evolve. Learn to ride the waves or get left behind. Like I said, see it as an opportunity for augmentation or a threat, your choice.

As regards the statement, the final publishing of this post after me going through the initial should have completely removed that statement as it was in the final draft. Must have ended publishing the initial or staying unedited, instead of the editing on my final draft. Changes would be made again.

For your last question, "what will happen to the people? " Well a lot of good things will happen to the people who learn to ride the tide of Ai art. The benefit outweighs the risk, that if we can or should even call it a risk.

Ai art has will potentially augment Natural art, and Natural art the same. A ground for coexistence is possible without one affecting the other, let allow that.

Thanks for your contribution.