Eto'o on Henry

The interviewers are problem creators at times, they made Samuel Eto'o say what he's not suppose to say as he was interviewed and asked who is the best between him and Thiery Henry and he said he is not in Thiery Henry's class, he speak futher that if Nickolas Anelka would be mentioned before Thiery Henry can be mentioned and he (Samuel Eto'o) is not in Nickolas Anelka's class. Maybe Samuel Eto'o should have just speak on his own, he shouldn't have mention other people's own. In Individual performances, Samuel Eto'o is good than Thiery Henry due to the number of goals that they both have for their different countries.

Apart from the fact that Eto'o is an African, he has goals more than Henry because Eto'o have 293 goals total in the club side while he have 51 goals for his country and he is still the highest goal scorer of all time for Cameroon. Although Henry is also the highest goal scorer for France as well, he have 290 goals for his the club side, so in the statistics, Eto'o have record than Henry. And Eto'o has established himself even before he play at Barcelona, he scored 56 goals for his country, he was at Real Mayorka in 2004 when he won African best player award although Henry has also won World Cup in 1993 but the statistics show the difference and they are both Striker.

In Individual achievements, Samuel Eto'o is still have record than Henry but taking of Nickolas Anelka that Eto'o added, Anelka isn't even a striker that can compete with Thiery Henry because Anelka didn't score up to 40 goals in any of the clubs that he has played. Anelka spent 4 years in Chelsea; 2008 to 2012 and he had only 37 or 30 goals in that four years, so he can't compete with Henry in record. Anelka have just 157 goals total in the clubs that he played for. It was when Theiry Henry played at Barcelona he was able to win Champions League but Samuel Eto'o has won it with Barcelona since 2006 so it's ridiculous as Samuel Eto'o said Nickolas Anelka is good than Henry.