Human brains should generally grow without any experiment.

Children, adolescents, and strong adults should develop normally. They should be able to think, examine and conceive, which results in increased synaptic connections in their brains, and they should be able to process insights and information characteristically.

If these people's minds are attacked by advances designed to control them, this could have the opposite effect and lead them to speak and act awkwardly and incorrectly. They might even become duller and stupider.

Their brains were functioning properly and excellently before the innovations were applied. Therefore, these facts should be taken into consideration and studied further.

In the case of offenders whose fundamentals are disturbed and whose young lives are out of control, the progress made in trying to wire their minds healthily and correctly could induce them to give up their crimes, relax and start thinking normally and rationally, and strain their brain capacities. If this can be done for this category of people by pointing their minds in the right direction with the help of innovations, it is an excellent thing. As a rule, there should also be more evidence in this area.

People who could benefit from the limitation of their intellect through innovation are young people and adults with intellectual disabilities. Innovation can help these people improve their emotional well-being and severely elevate their mental abilities. In that case, they will better mediate, move competently, and understand life better.

Brain control through innovation may only be suitable for some, although, as I mentioned earlier, several people can benefit from this.

Before actually applying it to humans, researchers and practitioners should be cautious about the implications of their tests and trials. If these tests and research are used on living beings, that is fine, but if applied to firm, intellectually healthy individuals, they could lead to dangerous results.

Human beings are much more valuable than living beings. Therefore, researchers and scientists should also pay attention to which human beings mainly apply their research and exploration.

Moreover, living beings and individuals may not respond when progress is applied to their minds. Therefore, this sensitive issue should be handled with caution and safeguard.

In short, these are the pros and cons of the issue, and these are the problems that will arise if efforts are made.