RE: Mass Formation Psychosis & COVID Euphoria
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
So, ah, not to be argumentative, but what's the alternative to fact checkers?
Like, what do you do if you want to find out if something is true or not?
0
0
0.000
my own research from non paid sources are almost always better not 100% but they have no incentive. But honestly I simply don't care about any of that stuff because there isn't anything I can do about it. I've found most people get angry and ticket off instead of actully having any form of real discussion anymore so I just focus on things within my space and live a MUCH better life by doing so. Step foot on that ground and try and take it from me and my freedoms however then I'll defend.
Oh cool. When you say 'non paid sources' what do you mean? Like, isn't literally making money off everything they put out these days? I'd love to get to know some trusted sites.
Totally hear you on not worrying about the crazy stuff around us... there's definitely a peace that comes with just tending your own garden (sometimes literally).
Dr David Martin is a good one to listening to because most of what he says is based on filed patents over the years. He could literally be sued into oblivion if defaming someone by lying. His credentials are impeccable. Still though you still have to separate what is known fact he presents with indisputable evidence and those moments of giving personal opinion. Opinions though do boil down to that question of trusting what an individual says, if they gain your trust by sticking their neck out it'll go a bit further than believing people who don't have a shred of evidence to back up anything they say.
Dr Peter McCullough is another one. He does tend to show up on Fox News and be asked his opinion but his face clearly shows he's disgruntled to the fact that his opinion is limited to the scope of what Fox News wants people to hear, it will be the truth...which Fox only wants when it fits their narrative, but like I said it's pretty evident he's not allowed to tell all the truths he'd like to if given an opportunity.
If it makes it all the way through the world court, where the paperwork has already been filed both of them will be testifying before the court if called on the case of crimes against humanity.
Uh, you don't, that's kind of the point.
If you want to figure out the truth you have to find people you trust.
You can't trust some random "authority" because they say you should.
So now we are stuck with some bullshit where uncovering the truth is very difficult and takes hours of research and careful consideration... unless you can find someone you can trust to do that work for you.
So essentially normal people stand no chance.
lol correct.
But crypto is changing the game.
Because like I said money talks and bullshit walks.
When people start getting paid by these networks they will listen to the people on the networks.
If the people on the network say mass formation psychosis is a thing people will listen, because listening directly equates to their own salary and livelihood. The trust relationship starts with symbiotic value transfer of decentralized wealth. As it stands now crypto is just a "scam" because there aren't enough jobs being offered to the population. Just gotta build out more infrastructure and gain more trust. It's all about trust.
No essentially unless you are awake enough to know a difference. Edicted in his statement above just ran down exactly what the problem is, it's people using information published then gleaning it to fit a narrative. No the insurance company did not say it was high payouts to those 64 retired, he said it's 18 to 64 working age people. So him being on the left they want that to fit in the narrative that it's just old comorbidity filled people dying instead of the right narrative claim that people are dying as the result of an experimental vaccine. So you see how that plays out and why it would be hard to keep up with.
Which you just did with Malone. Lmao. I was highly skeptical of him from the get go when he said he took the vaccine. That's an instance disqualifier especially coming from someone who said the technology shouldn't have been used. When two plus two doesn't add up right from the get go there is definitely something up with that.
I was right as he was on Laura's show fear mongering to the masses last week advising that everyone was going to get omicron, comparing it to the measles in transmission rate. Then he shows up on Bannon the other day confusing people into believing there's a deadly ebola type virus emerging out of China, which Bannon runs with which he then says he's not sure, it could or maybe couldn't. Most people didn't hear that last part as next thing you know it's making headlines.
The next thing you know your out hoarding up more supplies because it's sometimes hard to distinguish between the truths, half truths and the lies. I mean really you have to ask yourself why he just didn't come right out and tell Bannon in no uncertain terms there is no ebola type virus emerging out of China as Bannn's going about how dishonest the Chinese were with covid, keeping it hidden and in that regard the potential for athletes to carry this new virus across the globe. Right? Don't you think Malone should have spoke up and said clearly that he had no direct knowledge of a ebola type virus about to emerge? Maybe, maybe not doesn't cut it. Sure there were also other underlying political messaging that could have been playing into why he said that but the plain fact of the matter is that you, we, whoever are at a point were we can't underestimate anything being said or not thoroughly examine all the options as to why it was said. That's because it's hard to determine among who are the players and who really aren't. Who's in the know and who's not in the know of how the game is going to be further played out.
I'll go watch his video because, like I said I blew him off from the start. Mainly because someone doesn't talk down a technology but admit to taking a shot using the same technology they are talking down. Second is because there's been a few players in this whole game that have an ax to grind, the mere fact something he initially worked on becoming a useful profitable tool could actually be his ax because he's behind the fold not in the forefront of the fold. Now that he seems to be doing regular appearance on main stream media I will need to get a feel for his body language, gestures and talking points to get a more accurate depiction to help decipher the language.
Name one single thing that Malone said that I blindly parroted in my post.
That one thing doesn't exist.
Meanwhile: over at your comment...
Are you serious?
Is this a joke?
What the actual fuck?
Do you not realize that scientists change their mind when the data changes?
That's how science works.
He took the vaccine BEFORE he knew about any of this bullshit.
It was called OPERATION WARP SPEED for a reason; it happened quickly.
People were caught totally off-guard by all of this, including Malone.
Clearly my patience is in short supply today.
I can't even decipher what you are trying to actually say.
I'll give it a whirl though:
To which again I reply 'irrelevant'.
In addition to that sentiment being false, it also is totally off topic and pointless to the underlying discussion: which is that standard safety protocol is being completely ignored and anyone that raises concerns is being buried in a tidal wave of retribution.
You've obviously missed Malones transition off his course. He has claimed from the very beginning this technology should have not been used for a vaccine. He has claimed from the very beginning that the technology has never been proven to work using it in a vaccine setting.
No person uttering those words would have ever taken the vaccine. I highly doubt he ever took the vaccine or a whole host of others that have made that claim. Reason being not just the total slap down of the censorship but being grouped into the anti-vaxer crowd right off the bat eliminates that about ninety percent or more of the population would be interested in a word an antivaxer has to say, the majority of people are not anti vax.
Basically he couldn't get any leverage publicly because he was buried in an avalanche of fact checks that he wasn't the inventor of the technology and claims being made that the technology had advanced over the years to the point of even laying claim there had been successful vaccines developed with it. Couple that with the fact that no one was paying attention to him because there just wasn't any evidence to prove what he was initially telling people and the fact people, until something starts happening don't want to hear it.
So he was fact checked and shoved aside. He, in the beginning wasn't being banned nor censored. It wasn't until he fine tuned his talking points and the more people realized the injuries and death involved he may have been onto something. Now he's just not waving a red flag anymore he's gone full throttle into all the angles involved. He's evolved in other words. Now the vaccines are causing so much harm the right wing news media wants to talk with him but not on the vaccines and harms but he has evolved his talking points to included the variants, how the vaccinated can spun these variants but like everyone else he is still limited in what he can save. Like he's not allowed to go on Fox News and say what he originally came out and said, that being the technology should have never been used. He can say stuff like it was never a good idea to vaccinate during a pandemic and why but that's pretty much it. He can't go on there and bad mouth big pharma or the vaccines.
Many of the scientist/doctors/virologist/ immunologist people originally saw on these shows many have disappeared because many are not going to allow themselves to be spun into a narrative driven situation. I excuse Peter McCullough because you can see the pain in his face, his anguish and the fact he doesn't do it very often, most of what he does do is reinforce the alternative medication drive. Which I can see him doing considering it's something that has driven him all along.
The fact is that when Malone says he took a turn after seeing the data on how it was developed is a straight out lie because, face it, they just got ordered to turn that data over in the next couple months not seventy five years. The data he's talking about is the data you and I can find printed right here on the blockchain along with a whole host of other talking points that are out there.
The point being is it's really hard for me, in this particular case, to be celebratory over someone's talking points who has spent months trying to finally get his fifteen minutes of fame while from the very beginning his only claim to fame was he invented a technology that should have never been used to develop a vaccine, that they've spent years unsuccessfully trying to develop so how is it they can do it in record breaking time after decades of trying and then look you straight in the face and tell you he rushed right out and took the vaccine. That doesn't work for me. The rest of his talking points were/are already well known. He tried so hard to get his fifteen minutes he aligned himself with that crazy Judy Mikovitis at first, which probably hurt him more than helped him. But now he's in a position where the vaccines are failing and everyone wants to talk to him because he's gained notoriety on shows like Bannon and others bashing the vaccine technology, so the super conservatives on the right know people are willing to listen to him now so they'll invite him on to fit their narrative over the actual virus but not the failings of the vaccines. So yeah I don't have a whole lot of time to put into someone so wishy washy, who, in particular will fear monger people into rushing out to get the vaccine by telling them no one will escape getting the omicron, who admits he took his own failed technology vaccine while simultaneously showing up on other shows talking about the damages being done by the vaccines. Yeah, all that shit don't add up for me. He can switch course faster than someone doing a u turn on a ice road. We are in a situation where it's crucial people are following people who are truthful, I don't care how many talking points he steals from other people I just don't feel he's an appropriate trustworthy person deserving of people's time and attention. He's finally getting his fifteen minutes and he's selling it like a whore.
This information is much more valuable to me.
Seems like you've already put over 10x more time into him than I have :D
Just sayin.
Even in the Joe Rogan podcast he meta-talks about how much he's had to manipulate his own message to get the largest target audience. I'd guess your assessment of him is pretty accurate.
My ultimate question is: what do I do with all this information?
I don't have time to write that book... back to work I go.
Thanks for the seemingly balanced unbiased assessment.
Yeah if there was an insider trading for speculation on info one might be able to find it lucrative. lol. You know though he said something on Laura's show a week or so ago that made her eyebrows lift and her eyes pop wide open. He said that omicron seemed like a vaccine designed for purpose, something very similar to that. It's what he said afterward that caught my attention. He laughed heartily after saying he bet they didn't see that coming and something along the lines about throwing a curve ball in the plan. That last part led me to believe there was the possibility a few scientist got together and designed a less severe highly transmissible virus in an endeavor to create a herd immunity effect against the more severe variant. If possible or true it would be a one up-manship to two can play that game. I can believe such a possibility, I've watched some really excellent scientist out there who have a genuine love for humanity, enough so they'd find a way to try and save people from a bent globalist agenda. I even pray it's true as I watch how this has distorted my grandchildren's childhood. You only get to be a child once in life, there's no do overs. Staying ahead of the curve ball, that's how you survive. Thank goodness we have people who are willing to call it for what it is and stay ahead of that ball. If Malone is playing the game while defeating it at the same time I have no idea, like I said I haven't put that much energy into him but I intend to get more of a feel for the guy.
Its near impossible at this point to fully trust anything regarding stuff you cant personaly witness or experiment on as the case may be. It is helpful to read actual research, not what the media reports about it or the abstract, the actual data as well as obviously having a critical look at methodology and so on.
While, obviously, academics can not be trusted, at least to some degree the hard sciences you can look into and test on, the social sciences... Well, probably look at data older than 20 years ideally if you want to know anything other than what their narrative is, really. Of course, what we are interested in looking into itself is... Well, theres been a lot of interest in violence against women and rape of women, and there is data to show that the vast majority of not just domestic violence (and thats exclusivly direct physical violence, there are other forms of abuse of course but that is the clearest thus weve got a bit more data on that) but the majority of intimate partner violence is done by the female partner as well as rape by women, espacialy of children, is quite common. Over 90% of sexual abuse of those children by staff in american juvenile facilities is done by female staff for example. Even looking at that requires some stepping back from many of our assumptions.
However, what we do have, what we can allways rely on are ethical principles. The truth of the matter here is irrelevant, the existance of a state and state mandates or restrictions are never justified.