Member Management Notes
Each 20 % beneficiary rewards of this post will go to @zenokrom and @amburst this time. For more see the latest post on Beneficiaries.
Epilog
Congratulations to @zenokrom for maintaining position and @amburst for outpacing four positions. Congratulations to everyone else, as there is lots of minor movements in the lower parts of our table. Our procedures in action, without undue pressure to grow. While the latter has led to tremendous guild appreciation in the recent past, I suspect it wasn't worth the price if it wasn't heartfelt, but tied to one-sided expectations.
Experienced human rights do not mean that everything is nice and easy, but everyone has a chance to be heard, and differences can be readily addressed without those who accumulate power overruling those who fuel that power. But also without free riders thwarting those who aim high. Those who have class differences in mind will sooner or later run into trouble. And for the latter, again, there are the guidelines and gladly discussions about them to understand how the guidelines came into being and what work it takes to maintain and develop them.
If the guild was automated, I wouldn't spend hour after hour collecting stats and updating the score table. It would be more like an EVM. But then human exceptions could no longer be made to develop the guidelines for the time being. However, there would need to be a consensus and veto procedure where changes to the Guidelines would need to involve the use of private keys for confirmation, without individuals being able to block development completely - perhaps because they merely remain mute.
But my drafts are already open in a way that anyone can also make updates to share this work and perhaps even enjoy the work together. Because for no other reason I do this here. Even publications of the collected stats would be welcome, because I don't quite get around to craft the drafts into posts alongside the screenshots on my hard drive, because I have an urge to keep them in order. Darn perfection.
Index
- Timetable
- Internal Player Score Table
- If you are new to this
- What we expect from any member, in a nutshell
- Link to addendum
Timetable
08/20 10:36 PM CEST - @ninbum33 removed
08/20 09:00 PM CEST - top-up auction ended, one account will be removed
08/20 04:18 PM CEST - @aaustino2 joined
08/20 04:17 PM CEST - @aomori4 left
08/17 12:32 AM CEST - @m0ssa99 joined
08/16 11:25 PM CEST - @m1ki removed because of ignoring this text
08/16 03:57 PM CEST - @m1ki joined
08/15 02:01 PM CEST - @harry56 removed because of ignoring this text
08/15 06:48 AM CEST - @harry56 joined
[previous timetable]
Internal Player Score Table
Actively contributing accounts within the recent blawl and its position by score:
| Spot | Account | Calculated on | Score | DEC | Scrolls | Times brawled | favorite Tier 1 | f/T 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @anjanida | 07/25/22 | 2,341,200 | 29,265 | 80 | 95 | 8/9 | 7/8 |
| 2 | @sm-rules | 08/14/22 | 1,249,364 | 18,373 | 68 | 96 | 13 | 15 |
| 3 | @sodom-lv | 07/25/22 | 582,518 | 6,197 | 94 | 53 | 5/6 | 3/4 |
| 6 | @eika | 08/14/22 | 91,908 | 1,998 | 46 | 22 | 1/2 | 1 |
| 7 | @mervol | 08/14/22 | 75,816 | 1,458 | 52 | 20 | - | - |
| 8 | @ykyan2 | 08/20/22 | 46,292 | 652 | 71 | 36 | 1/2 | 7/8 |
| 12 | @zenokrom | 08/20/22 | 2,529 | 281 | 9 | 4 | - | - |
| 13 | @amburst | 08/20/22 | 1,650 | 550 | 3 | 2 | - | - |
| 14 | @phantomx123 | 08/20/22 | 1,360 | 340 | 4 | 2 | - | - |
| 15 | @xrypto202084 | 08/20/22 | 1110 | 185 | 6 | 2 | - | - |
| 16 | @xcryptogamer | 08/20/22 | 715 | 65 | 11 | 4 | - | - |
| - | @aomori4 | 08/14/22 | 591 | 591 | 0 | 2 | - | - |
| 18 | @ykyan4 | 08/20/22 | 180 | 20 | 9 | 5 | - | 3/4 |
| 19 | @mr-inc | 08/20/22 | 117 | 13 | 9 | 2 | - | - |
| 20 | @aaustino2 | 08/20/22 | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | - | - |
| 21 | @m0ssa99 | 08/20/22 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
@aomori4 left.
@m0ssa99 scheduled for removal, if all accounts were active for more then the recent brawl.
Passive accounts with no DEC or Scroll contribution within the recent blawl:
| Spot | Account | Calculated on | Score | DEC | Scrolls | Times brawled | Days ago | Tier 1 favorite | Tier 2 fav |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | @anjadani | 08/20/22 | 565,880 | 16,177 | 35 | 76 | 12 | 5/6 | 3/4 |
| 9 | @annijada | 08/20/22 | 42,570 | 1,290 | 33 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
Passive accounts with no DEC or Scroll contribution for more then the recent blawl, and therefore scheduled for removal:
| Spot | Account | Calculated on | Score | DEC | Scrolls | Times brawled | Days ago | Tier 1 favorite | Tier 2 fav |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | @tld05 | 08/20/22 | 130,720 | 1,376 | 95 | 70 | 15 | 3 | 2 |
| 11 | @amfrak | 08/20/22 | 9,308 | 358 | 26 | 9 | 38 | - | - |
| 10 | @fellonious | 08/20/22 | 16,482 | 5,494 | 3 | 4 | 28 | - | - |
| 17 | @ninbum33 | 08/20/22 | 500 | 500 | 0 | 3 | 14 | - | - |
@ninbum33 removed
For more recent notes an unofficial draft is at https://hackmd.io/@anjanida
If you are new to this
Become familiar with the member management, please. Because the guild spots are precious, the last in our list will be removed regularly. That is part of our procedure as noted in the addendum linked at the bottom. And if you don't acknowledge all this within the first 2 hours after you joined, you may be removed without notice right away. How can we know? Well, you'll see! And any questions are welcome anytime!
Please understand, it is not on me to show comprehension. I'll do the best I can! Though this guild is somewhat managed like a DAO. That is Decentral Autonomous Organisation. So I simply follow the procedures that have evolved here by now. And for when you become passive and no one can reach out to you in time, ugly things can happen. As documented in past notes. See e.g. https://peakd.com/@anjanida/member-management-notes-defc067f6e74f
If you want to join and stay, we can make that happen even with presently no open spot available. We may schedule it for that you can be there the moment our weakest contributor is removed. Sounds familiar somehow? Like with a mob abandoning their weakest offspring to survive a predator attack. Your contribution needs to be enough for not being the weakest. Everyone who got removed is welcome any time again. It's just that contributions from earlier are at zero any time an account re-joines.
What we expect from any enduring member, in a nutshell:
Priority A: Some contribution within the last 2 brawls. Without at least 1 DEC even a quest scroll will make this, if the Lodge is not maxed out for the rest of a season.
Priority B: Be not the weakest contributor in our mob the moment an auction ends. This moment is when a new brawl starts. The second to last score in the list is bold highlighted. That is the tide you need to take in DEC without scrolls added to the lodge yet for outpacing that account.
Link to addendum
For our recent Member Management Notes Addendum with general guidelines and procedures see
https://peakd.com/hive-179856/@anjanida/member-management-notes-addendum-rd1515